Archive for the ‘Disinformation’ Category

Would a Pediatrician Take All The Baby Vaccines? Why Not If They Are So Safe?

Sunday, March 16th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (https://www.staging.healthfreedomusa.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.

Viera Scheibner is a tireless foe of things that harm people, including vaccines. She is articulate and passionate. We have not met, but I like her immensely because she defends those who cannot defend themselves with facts and with feeling. Please read this excellent article and share it widely.

Thanks for your activism.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

VIC (Vaccine Injured Children)
By Viera Scheibner (Principal Research Scientist-retired)

Kanner described autism for the first time in 1943. At the time, the
administered vaccines were diphtheria, tetanus and occasional whooping
cough. Nowadays, babies and small children are given a multitude of vaccines
besides DPT and Polio: Hib since late 1980’s; in the US and Australia since
early 1990’s HepB at birth and more doses at 1 months or at two and 4 months
later, and, recently in the UK, USA and Australia, also meningococcal C and
pneumococcal vaccines. I am surprised that any babies survive such an
assault of toxic substances as vaccines are, containing not only a number of
foreign proteins (antigens) which are bacteria or their protein envelopes
and viruses, but also adjuvant and tissue fixatives and preservatives.
However, no babies survive without some deleterious effect, even though most
parents think that their babies were ‘perfectly normal’ until the last
assault by MMR. Their babies had previous reactions, but parents believed
their doctors that it was normal and to be expected. MMR was just the last
straw that broke the camel’s back! When I attended the Conference on Autism
at the Tulane Medical School in New Orleans, I told one of the
mother-doctors who organized the seminar that her son experienced serious
reactions to his first vaccines, not just MMR. First she said “No” and then
when I asked her to have a look at the photos of her child she was showing
during her lecture (from birth to after MMR), put her hand over one eye and
have a look where the other is aiming and then change hands, she would
notice that the child was not focusing properly and the color of the eyes
changed into pitch black (indicating toxicity). Then she admitted that he
screamed for 3 days after every DPT, Hib and Polio vaccines. I asked her
“What do you think he screamed of?” and she said she did not know. I told
her that he screamed from excruciating pain due to brain inflammation. She
should have prudently stopped any vaccination after the first screaming
event.

Animal viruses (the most well-known are the monkey, simian, viruses and
amoebas in the polio vaccines) contaminate the vaccines because most of them
are cultured on animals tissue and one does not have to be a rocket
scientist to realize that animal tissue contains animal microorganisms. The
amount of toxins, such as mercury exceeds manifold what is considered a safe
level. There is no safe level for formaldehyde. Is it surprising that it was
published already in 1990’s that the US infant mortality rates rival those
of the Third World? As if this was not disconcerting enough, when babies die
from vaccines, parents and other caregivers are accused of Shaken Baby
Syndrome (SBS)! Vaccinators not only kill your babies, then they also throw
you into prison. No thanks for your unquestioning compliance.

Many parents vaccinate because they are told and hence mistakenly believe
that infectious diseases represent a surge that has to be prevented at ANY
price; quite the opposite is true. Infectious diseases are beneficial for
children by priming and maturing their immune system, provided they are
properly managed. Complications and death may arise if such diseases are
mismanaged, by the inappropriate administration of antibiotics in a viral
disease such as measles; this damages the gut flora and suppresses the
immune system. Antibiotics are useless in a viral disease anyway, even if
they worked.
Relentless suppression of fever (an important healing process) is another
example of quackery in the orthodox medical system.
The best treatment in any infectious diseases is sufficiently high doses of
vitamin C.
There is also a substantial difference between acquiring measles by an
unvaccinated healthy child (meaning no vaccines at all, not just MMR) and a
vaccinated child: vaccinated children often have difficulty developing
natural immunity and may come down with measles several time. Those
vaccinated, and only those vaccinated, also may develop atypical measles,
which is an especially vicious form of measles due to immunosuppression by
vaccination.

I observe that even many of those doctors trying to warn of the dangers of
vaccines, say that they are not against vaccination and that they do not
want to see those large epidemics of measles, mumps and rubella. I urge
these doctors to take the time to study what has already been documented in
medical research about the dangers and ineffectiveness of individual
vaccines. The only safe vaccine is the one never administered.

The Amish who claim religious exemption to vaccination, did not report a
single case of measles between 1970 and 1987 (for 18 years!) That was the
time when the well-vaccinated communities experienced regular 2-3 year
epidemics amongst those who were vaccinated. Then, starting in December
1987, the Amish reported large outbreaks of measles already in 1982, just
when the US health authorities were going to pronounce measles eradicated
(by 1 October 1982). Obviously, infectious diseases have their own dynamics
which are not studied, because of the morbid preoccupation with vaccination.

When the individual US states mandated DPT vaccination starting in 1978, the
incidence of whooping cough increased in a sustained manner, with the
majority of cases occurring between 6 weeks and 6 months and in the
vaccinated! In contrast to this, when the UK parents stopped vaccinating in
1975, it was followed by the longest interepidemic period with the lowest
incidence of whooping cough on record. When the normal 4-year epidemic
arrived in 1978 the age distribution returned back to normal: the majority
of cases occurred in 4 year olds. The same happened in Sweden after 1979
when they discontinued the use of pertussis vaccine: no incidence below the
age of six months, with very low incidence below the age of 2 1/2 years and
the majority of cases occurring between 2 1/2 and 10 years. At that age,
whooping cough is not a dangerous disease. It is only potentially dangerous
in small babies.

When you hear about outbreaks of any ‘vaccine-preventable’ infectious
diseases, first ask how many of the ‘victims’ were vaccinated (you will
usually hear that most, if not all). In the last four years, Australia has
been experiencing large outbreaks of whooping cough, after our former health
minister increased the vaccination compliance by unlawful means, by making
certain social security payments depend on vaccination (even though this can
be circumvented when ‘conscientious objection’ is lodged; this is an equally
questionable practice since vaccination is not mandatory in Australia, so
why would anybody have to claim conscientious objection to it).
Large epidemics of polio followed mass vaccination drives in Taiwan, Oman,
Namibia, Gambia, Jordan, Albania and many other countries, typically mostly
after the first dose. This is all published in the Lancet and other
reputable medical journals.

Many medical researchers now admit that a pandemic of such immunoreactive
disorders as asthma and allergies is caused by too much hygiene and mass
vaccination programs, but that does not mean that we should change these
(harmful) health practices. They just fall short of saying that infectious
diseases are desirable, because having measles prevents asthma and other
immunoreactive diseases, degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage,
sebaceous skin diseases and certain cancers (as published in the Lancet in
1985). That having mumps prevents ovarian cancer, was published already in
1966. That rubella vaccination does not prevent congenital rubella syndrome
and that immunity acquired by having the disease is superior to that
acquired by vaccination, has been published in Australia and elsewhere.

Babies and small children do not need any vaccines. Individually
administered, measles, rubella and mumps vaccines are just as harmful as
given together. Medical Observer published my letter to the editor in which
I wrote that the best way to know whether MMR causes autism or not is to
stop using it. Japan admitted the causal link between MMR and the OBSERVED
side effects such as meningitis and simply discontinued MMR vaccination. No
epidemics of higher magnitude than normal of measles, mumps or rubella
followed. There is nothing wrong with that. When people tell me that the UK
Health Department published that so many children then died from measles, I
always ask “And you believe it?” Vaccinators are capable of publishing not
only lies, “They publish total lies”, as one TV cameraman said.

Parents believe your own eyes. Sadly, you can’t trust doctors who can’t even
see the value of their own research results. One or two cases of adverse
events after vaccination may be coincidental, but not hundreds of thousands
of cases all over the vaccine-crazy developed world. Do vaccines cause
autism? Quite obviously, they do! You have seen it with your own eyes and
some even video-recorded it. I am re-introducing the word OBVIOUS into
science. Besides this, there is plenty of published research documenting how
and why vaccines cause autism (and many other deleterious effects): by
deranging all systems in the body, starting with the immune system. There
are many angles to approach this problem, but they all point in the same
direction. Stop vaccinating and you will have healthy and normal children,
as non-vaccinating parents all over the world will confirm. The only people
who should get vaccines are the vaccinators. Medical Observer published
another of my letters to the editor, in which I challenged an aggressive
pro-vaccinator to go on TV and to show us how safe vaccines are, by allowing
himself to be injected with all baby vaccines and either put up put up or
shut up. He chose to shut up. I told a few prosecutors in the US to take
their flu injections every year. Tell vaccinators to take their own medicine
and then watch the horror in their eyes.

Something Evil This Way Comes: Direct to Consumer With a Deadly Flavor

Sunday, March 16th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (https://www.staging.healthfreedomusa.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD

Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Given that flu vaccination (96% of all available doses contain high levels of mercury, the rest contain high-enough-levels to damage the recipient, too!) is being pushed for babies and children, the elderly and everyone in between and that the CDC recently stated that it misses the flu viruses causing this year’s seasonal flu at least 60% of the time, it is truly astonishing that the CDC is none the less pushing the annual vaccination of all children and seniors RIGHT NOW! QUICK, DON’T WAIT ANOTHER SECOND! with a vaccine which is dangerous, may be deadly, can shed the disease-causing viruses it contains to infect other, does the same with a large number of recipients and is medically worthless. Astonishing, that is, until you realize that the CDC never met a vaccine it did not love (including the deadly Rotovirus vaccine which, despite the fact that it it opens children to high incidences of seizures and pneumonia and, alas, death, is being approved non-the-less) and is willing to engage in deep cover-ups of vaccine injury to protect the industry it is supposed to be regulating. One has to conclude that the “Fact of Life” conflicts of interest in regulators that Ted Kennedy said were to be expected, not stringently routed out, when he proposed the lamentably successful “FDA Revitalization Act, S. 1810 in last year’s Congress are, in many cases, “Facts of Death” and “Facts of “Tragedy” and “Facts of Shame.

I am proposing the entire vaccine industry, without exception, for the Natural Solutions Foundation Hall of Shame. I am also proposing that the Administration and Staff of Arizona State University Join them. For Shame!

Read on. These are quotes taken from publicly available media about the proliferation of vaccination and the new “Marketing Partnerships” emerging to vaccinate everyone, even those for whom risk is rediculously low, except from the vaccine. Note that the strategy includes more adolescent vaccinations to encourage more adult vaccines, needed or not, deadly or not, dangerous or not.

For Shame!

Now get angry, and get everyone you know to join the Natural Solutions Foundation No-Forced-Vaccination Forum (http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/NSF-Panama/join) and get involved. NOW! The option is to NOT get involved and watch as you and everyone you know and love is vaccinated with God Knows What, over and over and over and over.

Now is the time to stop this horror story.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD

Medical Director
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Influenza Resource Center

Seasonal influenza epidemics are annually responsible for between 3 million and 5 million cases of severe illness and between 250,000 and 500,000 deaths worldwide. On average, approximately 36,000 deaths due to seasonal influenza occur in the United States each year. Influenza viruses can also cause pandemics, such as that of 1918 which killed at least 20 million people. Global health authorities are increasingly worried that the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza in several areas of the world poses a serious, widespread threat to humans in the future, and the evolving situation is being closely monitored. Preparedness is the key to minimizing the effects of flu epidemics and pandemics, however. This collection of Medscape resources for clinicians provides essential information on influenza epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and management. For a comprehensive review, see the ACP Chapter, Respiratory Viral Infections.
http://www.medscape.com/resource/influenza?src=rcupdate#2

Medscape Infectious Diseases
Expert Column
Influenza Vaccination: Challenges for Adolescent and College Healthcare

Posted 01/15/2008

Allan L. Markus, MD, MS, MBA

Seasonal Influenza: Burden of Illness

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, influenza and pneumonia combined were the eighth leading cause of death in the United States.[1] Furthermore, in a 1993 article by Sullivan and colleagues,[2] it was estimated that over 4.1 million people had excess respiratory illnesses due to influenza and that this translated to 16.6-17.9 million restricted activity work days. In a study by Molinari and colleagues,[3] they estimated that in 2003, the cost of caring for influenza in the United States alone would be $10.4 billion with another $16.3 billion in lost earnings and productivity — with a total economic cost of $87 billion.

Seasonal Influenza: Clinical Presentation

Typically patients become infected with influenza by inhalation of respiratory droplets from another infected individual. There is a 1- to 4-day incubation period, and once sick, the patient can be infectious up to 10 days after the onset of symptoms. Typical symptoms include significant malaise, fever, body aches, headache, sore throat, and cough. Unlike common cold symptoms, rhinorrhea and sinus congestion are not as prominent symptoms. Clinical symptoms alone cannot either rule in or rule out the presence of influenza, and rapid testing is now available for both influenza A and B. Secondary bacterial infections are possible, including staphylococcal pneumonia, usually heralded by a rapid worsening of the pulmonary picture and fevers in a patient with previously diagnosed influenza. The influenza virus may also cause a primary viral pneumonia. Most patients recover from influenza with little or no residual problems, although the malaise may last for 2-4 weeks in some cases.[4] [Emphasis mine -REL]

Seasonal Influenza: Vaccine and Treatment Rates

Although there are studies that show ranges of efficacy that can be up to 70% to 90% depending on the year for the inactivated influenza vaccine, the vaccination rate in the general population is low
(only 48% in 2004).[5] Despite medication being available for those who are diagnosed with the flu, it has been estimated that only 15% of primary care physicians prescribe this medication for those with the flu, and more importantly, 24% who met the criteria did not receive the medication.[6]

Seasonal Influenza: Implications of Vaccination of Low-Risk Populations

Adolescents and college-age students represent groups that are not at high risk for serious disease or mortality, [Emphasis mine – REL] but because of their living and going to school in such close quarters, they can easily spread the infection. Although there are segments of this population that are at higher risk for severe infections, such as those with asthma, HIV, and those who are pregnant, [in] the vast majority are healthy adults for whom there are little trial data to show clinical or economic benefit for mass influenza vaccination. Thus, with its low mortality in this younger population, making a case for universal vaccination of the adolescent and college-age population requires one to look beyond influenza’s mortality potential. [Emphasis mine – REL, comment: this requires one to lood beyond influenza’ mortality potential to its profit potential -REL]

Healthy Adults

There are a few studies, however, that have looked at the impact of vaccination of healthy adults. In one of the only placebo-controlled, randomized trials of 2375 healthy adults, vaccination when well matched (efficacy over 80%) provided protection against influenza-like illness, excess physician visits, and lost workdays by 34%, 42%, and 32%, respectively.[7] This came at an overall cost of $11 per person vaccinated for the healthy adult. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has recently put out its 2007 update of its 2006 recommendations and stated that all healthy people, including school-aged children, who want to reduce their risk of becoming ill with influenza should be vaccinated.[8] {Emphasis mine – REL]

College-Age Students

College-age students do not get vaccinated as often as those who are older. Some studies have shown that vaccination is linked to individual health beliefs on susceptibility to influenza and a higher degree of fear about side effects, but also may be related to costs.[9,10] In her August 2007 article, Middleman[10] proposed more use of mandatory vaccinations in adolescents to improve vaccination rates for other vaccines. She noted, however, the potential backlash for making certain vaccinations mandatory. This may be especially true in cases in which the benefit for certain populations in terms of economic outcomes has not been conclusively shown. [Emphasis mine, shame, hers – REL] Developing new models to get messages on susceptibility, safety, and costs to students on influenza vaccination could be an important method to increase the number of students choosing to become vaccinated. [Emphasis mine – risk, yours -REL]
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/568193

Seasonal Influenza: Novel Preparedness Approaches at Arizona State University

Arizona State University (ASU) is a 63,000-student university located in the greater Phoenix metropolitan area. Its largest campus is the Tempe campus, having 55,000 students who attend classes and with about 9000 living on campus. The Campus Health Service provides the primary healthcare services on the 55,000-student Tempe Campus and collaborates with its healthcare partners at the 3 other campus locations. ASH decided to partner with both a vaccine manufacturer (CSL Biotherapies) and an advertising agency (Hal Lewis Group) to improve messaging and increase the vaccination numbers on our campus.
Methods
[Emphasis mine -REL]

ASU was approached by CSL Biotherapies* with the concept of developing a more comprehensive program to distribute vaccine to students, faculty, and staff. [Emphasis mine- REL] We used a marketing theme called “Season Pass.” The strategy for increasing vaccination rates was multifaceted:

* Influenza vaccine distribution events: Campus Health Service held 2 week-long events at the Student Union. Timing was done during the peak period of student activity from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm.

* Giveaway strategy: All students who received a vaccine received an ASU T-shirt that displayed the Season Pass logo and passed on the message to make the campus “Flu-less.” Students also received a postage-paid postcard that they could send home to inform parents that they had received their flu shot.

* Residence hall distribution: Nursing staff planned days to administer vaccine in the residential halls.

* Campus signage and advertising campaign: ASU, in association with a professional branding and marketing team, developed signage and media advertising that included student newspapers and radio stations marketing the Season Pass campaign.

Results

In the 2006-2007 season, ASU ran a number of employee flu clinics and distributed vaccine through our health center and the Student Union to students. Nine hundred twenty-seven vaccines were distributed to students, and 1416 were distributed to employees for a total of 2343 doses of vaccination.

During the fall 2007 season, using the new methodology above, 2049 students were vaccinated and 1931 employees were vaccinated, for a total of 3980 vaccinations distributed (Figure). These results occurred despite an increase in price from $10/vaccination in 2006 to $18/vaccination for students and $20/vaccination for employees in 2007.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/568193_2

*CSL Biotherapies is a subsidiary of CSL Limited, which operates one of the world’s largest flu vaccine manufacturing facilities for supply to global markets … http://www.cslbiotherapies-us.com/s1/cs/becs/1160756085082/content/1160756085001/home.htm

Organic? Not So Fast, Mr./Ms. Comsumer

Sunday, March 16th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (https://www.staging.healthfreedomusa.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD

Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Organic sounds quite nice: clean, pure and healthy. I think of it as a social and biological value system manifested in food and soap and face cream. In point of fact, as the USDA has taken pains to point out, it is a legal definition and nothing more.

I think it is something more: it is a way to avoid most pesticides, eat food that is 90% or more GM free (the US, alone among nations, allows 10% contamination with GM “Frankenfoods” in what it will allow to be called “Organic” while most other countries insist on no more than 0.09% contamination, a 111 fold increase in permitted contamination).

And I would hope that “Organic” is a meaningful certification system, backed by the supposed integrity of the United States Government, upon which the consumer can rest because they can trust a nation as mighty, as committed to the rule of law as the US, as gigantically powerful as the US in setting global agricultural policy, through Codex and elsewhere, to protect me from contamination and deceitful practices including contamination of my organic purchases with known carcinogens, right? After all, when the US passed a law which said that no state (read California, Colorado, Pennsylvania) could have a law more stringent than the US Government’s own standards, part of the argument for that law was that the resources of the Federal Government were so much more powerful and vast than those of any State that it could do the best job possible of assuring standards we could rely upon when we looked for “Organic” products. OF course, that would mean that you could rely on the presence of the word “Organic” to mean that the product was, in fact, tested by some government agency and found to be, in fact, in compliance with the standards for Organic products.

Remember, the chemical found in this study is approved for use by Codex Alimentarius. In fact, when I did a search on the Codex Alimentarius website for Ethylene Oxide, the result was “Too Many Results!”. Codex Alimentarius>Food Additives> Residue Limits gave the same result: “Too Many Results!”. Searching for Standards and Standard Measurements yielded the same frightening results: the stuff is absolutely ubiquitous. Food Additives> Guidelines – same results. Food Additives> Advisory and Other Texts> same results. When I searched Ethylene Oxide > Organic > Food Additives > Recommended Codes of Practice > Certification I got the same answer: “Too Many Results!”

Checking in the official Codex Alimentarius

    Guidelines for the Production, Processing, Labeling and Marketing of Organically Produced Foods

we find no mention of either Ethylene Oxide or 1,4-Dioxane so either the search engine is malfunctioning or there are really too many results to list. Hmmm.

Either way, however, it’s bad, bad stuff and has no place in food or preparations that we come in contact with, let alone in Organic ones!

Here is what the World Health Organization has to say in a Technical Monograph about Ethylene Dioxide:

Summary
Ethylene oxide is a colourless, highly reactive gas at room temperature and pressure. Almost all of ethylene oxide produced is used in the manufacture of ethylene glycol, but some amount is used as a sterilant for health care materials and other heat-sensitive products. Ethylene oxide is an alkylating agent and forms protein and DNA adducts. [Meaning that it changes the DNA and protein in the body, which is where part of its ability to cause cancer comes from – REL ] Based on studies in animals, cancer is considered the critical end-point for effects of ethylene oxide on human health for long-term exposure of the general population. [Meanng that what happens when you are exposed to it is that your chances of getting cancer from it go up. – REL]

http://www.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?sesslan=1&codlan=1&codcol=38&codcch=54

In the following report on the important study commissioned by the Organic Consumer’s Association of natural and organic products, the level and frequency of contamination with 1,4-Dioxane, a known carcinogen, is shocking. Companies like JASON Pure Natural & Organic; Giovanni Organic Cosmetics; Kiss My Face; Nature’s Gate Organics all were found to be marketing products containing the deadly chemical despite their self-styled “Organic” status – for which you pay extra, of course. Shame on them!

I nominate each of these companies for the Natural Solutions Foundation Hall of Shame and, at the same time, nominate the Organic Consumers Association for our Hall of Fame for doing the study and making it public.

By the way, consumers have driven the outstanding growth of the organic food sector (20-24% growth annually while the conventional food sector is generally flat) because they believe that such food is better for them. Michael Pollan, in The Omnivore’s Dilemma, a truly outstanding book, discusses the good, the bad, the ugly, the questionable and the perplexing in organic. But, all in all, fewer pesticides, fewer contaminants and , perhaps most of all, no GM Frankenfood would make the financial premium for organic worth it, at least to consumers who realize that GM foods are dangerous and their dangers are ignored by our government. Genetically modified foods (GM) were first defined as identical to the foods they resemble, real foods, that is, by George H. W. Bush who declared them to be equivalent. That led to the FDA deciding that no safety testing or data was required for any patented food to be introduced into the diet of the American (or any other ) people and that food would be sold to them without any labeling to make it clear that they were eating food which, although it could be patented, was administratively declared to be identical. I actually do not get that at all: if a plant or animal is so distinctive that a patent can be granted to give exclusive ownership to the company that holds that patent, what makes it identical to a food that cannot be patented because the world owns it?

Following that logic, of course, cloned, patented meats and milk are identical because the FDA said they are and consumers have no right to know what they are eating because, according to the FDA, they would not be able to tell the difference.

So the USDA, which houses the progressively more emasculated National Organics Standards Board (http://www.ams.usda.gov/nosb/) certifies products “Organic” and assures us that they are free of carcinogenic chemicals. In fact, we have a weak agency which is better than nothing and the words “organic” and “natural” without certification mean exactly that: nothing. My advice: Don’t buy them. Don’t use them.
Period.

Note that Cummins and Steinman say: All USDA Certified brands tested in this study were 1,4-Dioxane-free, including: Dr. Bronner’s, Sensibility Soaps (Nourish), Terressentials. All German Natural “BDIH” Certified brands tested were found to be 1,4-Dioxane-free: Aubrey Organics, Dr. Hauschka.

This kind of information deserves to be shared. Please share it widely and, while you are at it, take a moment to ask the people you share it with to join the hundreds of thousands of supporters of the Natural Solutions Foundation by signing up for the free, secure information-packed Health Freedom eAlerts at https://www.staging.healthfreedomusa.com/index.php?page_id=187. And don’t forget to make your tax deductible donation now. Recurring donations are a huge help. Give what your heart and your head tell you is right: click here (https://www.staging.healthfreedomusa.com/index.php?page_id=189) to support the Natural Solutions Foundation. Please do it now, while you are thinking about it.
Natural Solutions: We are more than just talk: We are the most effective health freedom voice in the world!

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Ronnie Cummins, 218-226-4164 (Organic Consumers Association)
David Steinman, 310-455-8952

Carcinogenic 1,4-Dioxane Found in Leading ‘Organic’ Brand Personal Care Products
USDA Certified Products Test Dioxane-Free

ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA – March 14 – A newly released study commissioned by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), a watchdog group with over 500,000 members, and overseen by environmental health consumer advocate David Steinman (author of The Safe Shopper’s Bible), analyzes leading “natural” and “organic” brand shampoos, body washes, lotions and other personal care products for the presence of the undisclosed carcinogenic contaminant 1,4-Dioxane. A reputable third-party laboratory known for rigorous testing and chain-of-custody protocols, performed all testing.

Ethoxylation, a cheap short-cut companies use to provide mildness to harsh ingredients, requires the use of the cancer-causing petrochemical Ethylene Oxide, which generates 1,4-Dioxane as a by-product. 1,4-Dioxane is considered a chemical “known to the State of California to cause cancer” under proposition 65, and has no place in “natural” or “organic” branded personal care products. 1,4-dioxane is also suspected as a kidney toxicant, neurotoxicant and respiratory toxicant, among others, according to the California EPA, and is a leading groundwater contaminant. Although previous studies have revealed 1,4-Dioxane is often present in conventional personal care products, this new study indicates the toxin is also present in leading “natural” and “organic” branded products, none of which are certified under the USDA National Organic Program. The products/brands tested are listed on the attached page with the level of 1,4-Dioxane detected, if any, along with ethoxylated ingredients listed on the label.
Some of the Leading Brands Found to Contain 1,4-Dioxane: JASON Pure Natural & Organic; Giovanni Organic Cosmetics; Kiss My Face; Nature’s Gate Organics.

Both the OCA and Steinman are calling for misleadingly labeled “Organic(s)” brands which include ethoxylate ingredients or otherwise utilize petrochemicals in their ingredients, to drop all organic claims from their branding and labeling. “The practice of ethoxylating ingredients or using other petroleum compounds must end for natural personal care, and is that much more outrageous in so-called ‘organics’ brand products,” says Ronnie Cummins, Executive Director of the OCA. “At a time when our nation is dangerously dependent on foreign oil and attempting to wean itself off unnecessary dependence on petroleum-based ingredients in major consumer products for national security reasons, it is self-defeating that we are literally bathing ourselves and our children in toxic petroleum compounds,” says Steinman. “But consumers should also take heart in the emergence of a growing number of companies who’ve received the message and who are seeking to completely avoid petrochemicals in their cosmetic and personal care products. Your best bet is to purchase products whose ingredients you can pronounce or better yet are certified under the USDA National Organic Program.”

Brands Found not to Contain 1,4-Dioxane: All USDA Certified brands tested in this study were 1,4-Dioxane-free, including: Dr. Bronner’s, Sensibility Soaps (Nourish), Terressentials. All German Natural “BDIH” Certified brands tested were found to be 1,4-Dioxane-free: Aubrey Organics, Dr. Hauschka.

A visit to any health food store unfortunately reveals the majority of products in the personal care section with “organic” brand claims are not USDA certified, and contain only cheap water extracts of organic herbs and maybe a few other token organic ingredients for organic veneer. The core of such products are composed of conventional synthetic cleansers and conditioning ingredients usually made in part with petrochemicals. According to market statistics, consumers are willing to pay significantly more for products branded “natural” or “organic” which they believe do not contain petrochemical-modified ingredients or toxic contaminants like 1,4-Dioxane.

To avoid 1,4-Dioxane, the OCA urges consumers to search ingredient lists for indications of ethoxylation including: “myreth,” “oleth,” “laureth,” “ceteareth,” any other “eth,” “PEG,” “polyethylene,” “polyethylene glycol,” “polyoxyethylene,” or “oxynol,” in ingredient names. In general, the OCA urges consumers to avoid products with unpronounceable ingredients. “When it comes to misbranding organic personal care products in the US, it’s almost complete anarchy and buyer beware unless the product is certified under the USDA National Organic Program,” says Cummins.

The study builds on the extensive survey conducted by Steinman for his book Safe Trip to Eden (Perseus Books 2007), in association with the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, the Breast Cancer Fund and the Environmental Working Group, which found that many mainstream children’s bubble bath and shampoo products contain dangerous amounts of this undisclosed carcinogen.

Vaccine Freedom Movement Growing

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Barbara Loe Fisher, the tireless vaccine freedom advocate, has published an excellent partial summary of the growing grassroots opposition to the forced vaccination of children. Here it is:
Grassroots Vaccine Freedom Movement Gears Up

by Barbara Loe Fisher

The grassroots vaccine safety and freedom movement in America, which was launched by parents of DPT vaccine injured children in 1982, has been gaining public support during the past quarter century as the numbers of vaccines medical doctors force children to get has more than doubled. From New York and New Jersey to Missouri and Mississippi Americans young and old in big towns and small cities around the nation are joining together to talk about how to change the increasingly oppressive mandatory vaccination laws in their states so they can make informed, voluntary decisions about vaccination.

It is no surprise that decades of collective denial and neglect by the medical community has led to a demand for fewer and more flexible vaccine laws. The calls jamming the phone lines and the emails and letters from desperate parents pouring into the National Vaccine Information Center have never been more alarming or heartbreaking than they are right now.

Mothers describe how they took their child to a pediatrician or public health clinic for a scheduled well baby “check-up” or sick child visit and witnessed nurses and doctors injecting their child with 5 or 8 or 12 vaccines all at once, Then, they say, they watched their children regress into chronic poor health and disability. Many of the children have suffered previous vaccine reactions, which were ignored or dismissed as “a coincidence” by doctors insisting the children be re-vaccinated. Other children are sick and on antibiotics. Others have been born premature or have personal or family histories of severe allergies and autoimmune and neurological disorders.

Over and over again, mothers describe in identical terms what they witnessed, their babies and children suffer following vaccination – seizures, high pitched screaming, collapse, unconsciousness, high fevers, body rashes, head banging, flapping, profound personality changes – cognitive and physical regression that changes the child physically, mentally and emotionally forever. And over and over again, mothers describe how their pediatricians stubbornly deny the vaccines just given had anything to do with what happened.

As someone who has witnessed the proliferation of vaccines and vaccine laws devastate the health of three generations of children, there are no words to adequately describe the pain, despair and fear that has destroyed the once joyful time of young parenting in America today. Children and their parents have become unwilling victims of a medical- industrial complex driven by the profit motive and powered by an ideology that has a callous disregard for individual human life.

It is no wonder that more and more Americans, young and old, are demanding the right to make informed, voluntary vaccination choices for themselves and their families. The grassroots vaccine safety and freedom movement in America is taking root in many states, particularly in those with the fewest exemptions and most vaccine mandates inflexibly implemented.

The conscientious belief exemption to vaccination should be added to the religious exemption in every state and medical exemptions should be widened to provide enlightened physicians with the power to write exemptions for those who do and do not have medical conditions conforming to the narrow one-size-fits-all contraindication guidelines of the CDC and AAP.

The right to informed consent to use of any pharmaceutical product or medical procedure, which carries a risk of injury or death, is a human right. Vaccination should be no exception.

NVIC supports the efforts in every state to change vaccine laws to allow informed, voluntary vaccine decision-making. In Mississippi, parents will be meeting March 17, 2008 at 6 p.m. at the Flowood Public Library, 103 Winners Circle, Flowood, MS to talk about adding a conscientious belief exemption to Mississippi state laws, which only allow a medical exemption. Go to http://parents.m eetup.com/465/ for more information.

***********************************************************

“As states move to require more vaccines for school-age children, an increasing number of parents are saying no to some of the inoculations. They are seeking exemptions from the state in growing numbers….Rita M. Palma, of Bayport, N.Y., sought a religious exemption from vaccines for her three sons but was turned down after a hearing with school officials. She said she had become increasingly uncomfortable with the vaccines the boys were getting…..After submitting a written request for a religious waiver, she was questioned at a two-hour hearing by the lawyer for the Bayport-Bluepoint School District and turned down last February by the school board. The New York Civil Liberties Union is now pursuing her case. “It is unbelievably traumatic to have your religious convictions questioned,” Mrs. Palma said. “For schools to be in the religious sincerity business is just outrageous.” Sue Collins, co-founder of the New Jersey Alliance for Informed Choice in Vaccination, said parents often face a variety of roadblocks when seeking vaccine exemptions in the state. “We see schools decline letters, or tell parents that clergy must write letters,” she said. “Parents are being harassed and being asked to do things above and beyond the law.” Assemblywoman Charlotte Vandervalk, a Republican from Bergen County, who introduced a conscientious exemption bill for vaccines, said parents shouldn’t have the burden of proving a religious or medical reason to refuse vaccines. “This is America; you don’t force it on everybody,” Ms. Vandervalk said.” – Fran Silverman, New York Times, (March 2, 2008)
http://www.nytimes.com/ 2008/03/02/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/02Rvaccine.ht ml? _r=3&pagewanted=1&ref=nyregionspecial2&oref=slog in&oref=slogin

“The point of it is the parents should be in charge of the health care needs of their children,” said Drumright, whose daughter is 8 and sons are 6 and 4. “It’s not up to the state to dictate to parents how they should make important health care decisions about their children.” Sen. John Loudon, R-Chesterfield, said he’s considering backing a proposal for a personal exemption. He has headed similar efforts in the past, most recently in 2003. “I am always open to it,” Loudon said of the idea of a personal exemption. “I think when a parent does their diligence and has cause for alarm, they should have the authority over government to control the health of their children.”……Missouri parents once had the right to exempt their children from immunizations without needing to provide a reason. But the law changed in 1992, and now parents can only opt out of their kids’ shots for religious or medical reasons…..”As more and more vaccines are being added to the list, that is where you’re getting some pushback by parents, and legitimately so,” said Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, a vaccine safety watchdog agency in Vienna, Va. She said parents are feeling pressured and powerless with all the vaccine mandates. “The one- size-fits all approach to vaccinations … is simply not medically responsible,” Fisher said. “Parents have to be given more flexibility.” – Andale Gross, Associated Press (February 29, 2008)
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/new s/stories.nsf/missouristatenews/story/6B1F6136D15D 8F1F862573FF00201C8D?OpenDocument

“Tyler’s father, Chris Holzinger, said, “After his 2-year-old vaccinations, he became less verbal; eye contact ceased. He started swaying, head-butting, doing a lot of these autistic characteristics.” Tyler’s parents and 200 others are active in an online support group backing a bill giving Mississippi parents the choice to not have all vaccines….Kellie Bischoff, president of the support group, said,”Well, that’s a scary thought, but if you look at the other 48 states with nonmedical exemptions, it really is not an issue. They do not have outbreaks.” Just like the other 48 states, the support group wants religious and philosophical exemptions added to the bill. Mississippi and West Virginia are the only states without the exemptions. Even though it’s risky, the support group president stopped vaccinating her oldest daughter, Emma, at 2 years old because she had seizures. Her youngest, 2- year-old Addie, hasn’t been vaccinated yet. Bischoff said, “If something were to happen and there were a serious vaccine reaction, the parent is ultimately responsible for taking care of this child, not the doctors, not the state, not the school board.” – WAPT-TV (ABC affiliate in Jackson, MS) (February 11, 2008)http://www.wapt.com/news/15276018/detail.html

Facts Worth Noting About Pediatric Flu Vaccination

Friday, February 29th, 2008

The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.

For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (https://www.staging.healthfreedomusa.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

November 18, 2007

The following article presents testimony and statistics which any health freedom advocate or parent will find useful in considering whether they want to be vaccinated or have their child vaccinated against their will.

Vaccinating For Profit – From Cradle to Coffin News
February 2, 2006. By Evelyn Pringle

Due to the flooding of special education classrooms, along with the rising medical costs of treating injured children, local taxes will soon go through the roof, at which time the public will be forced to face the unthinkable truth about the poisoned generation.

And when that happens, government officials had better not even think about trying to feign ignorance because parents, scientists, and medical experts have been screaming about the epidemic in vaccine injuries, from one end of the country to the other, since the 1990s, and the fact is that lawmakers knowingly allowed it to happen.

Over the past twenty years, our government has facilitated a nationwide experiment on our country’s youngest citizens via the Mandatory Childhood Vaccine Schedule, and the tragic results of the experiment can be equally credited to the joint efforts of compromised regulatory officials and politicians, and the pharmaceutical industry that stood to make billions.

In a perverse twist of fate, the vaccine program has evolved into a grand profiteering scheme, second only to the military industrial complex’s war on terror fiasco. Instead of prevention, the program has resulted in an epidemic of serious health problems for an entire generation of children and at the same time, produced an infinite market expansion for the sale of other prescription drugs, for the scheme’s developers.

The start of the epidemic can be traced to the late 1980s, when public health officials dramatically increased the number of vaccines, which contained the mercury-based preservative thimerosal, without taking into consideration the impact of the cumulative mercury load on developing brains of infants.

Once the mercury poisoning was discovered by the FDA in 1999, vaccine-makers claimed they were eliminating thimerosal from vaccines but they never recalled the vaccines already on the market and children continued to receive mercury in vaccines for several more years. Even today, the flu vaccine recommended for 6-month-old babies and pregnant women still contain a full dose of thimerosal.

Instead of ordering drug companies to get the preservative out of all vaccines, Congressional Republicans and President George W Bush spent much of the past 3 years working on strategies to give the pharmaceutical industry protection against lawsuits from vaccine injured children. A handful of shameless Congressional Republicans remained lurking around in the shadows for years, just waiting for the right moment to attach the protective provision to some “anti-terror” spending bill until they succeeded in December 2005.

Before the age of two in this country, children receive at least 20 injections involving twelve diseases. By the time they reach first grade, they have had at least 24 vaccinations, if they are in compliance with the CDC’s 2005 Immunization Schedule. [By the time they reach age 18, if they have been vaccinated according to the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule, they have received fully 78 vaccinations! Comment by Dr. Rima]

For good reason, many parents do not want their children to receive 24 injections for diseases they have never heard of [and another 58 by age 18! Comment by Dr. Rima]. However, government officials use every trick in the book to force them to inject these poisonous concoctions into their children, including economic sanctions for refusing to comply.

Refusing vaccination can result in citizens being denied enrollment in daycare, elementary school, and college; denial of health insurance; denial of employment; and denial of federal and state benefits for poor children including cutting off medical care under Medicaid, and food, under the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program.

Medical professionals have been trying to get lawmaker to take notice of the health problems caused by vaccines since the 1990s. On June 14, 1999, Jane Orient, MD, Executive Director of the Associating of American Physicians and Surgeons, testified before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources of the Committee on Government reform and said:

“Striking increases in chronic illnesses have occurred in temporal association with an increase in vaccination rates,” she said. “Asthma and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, causes of lifelong morbidity and frequent premature death, have nearly doubled in incidence since the introduction of many new, mandatory vaccines.”

“There is no explanation for this increase,” Orient added.

“Even more alarming,” she told lawmakers, “is the huge increase in reports of autism and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, with devastating, life-long impacts.”

“Measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B, and the whole panoply of childhood diseases are a far less serious threat,” Orient warned, “than having a large fraction (say 10%) of a generation afflicted with learning disability and/or uncontrollable aggressive behavior because of an impassioned crusade for universal vaccination.”

About 3 years later, across the country on the West Coast, Barbara Loe Fisher, President of the National Vaccine Information Center, testified before the California Senate Committee on Childhood Immunization Mandates: Politics vs Public Health on January 23, 2002. Fisher acknowledged that the CDC, and American Academy of Pediatrics, vigorously deny that the vaccines could have anything to do with more children being chronically ill.

“Yet, the haunting question remains,” she said, “if we have wiped out polio and almost eliminated measles, mumps, rubella, whooping cough and other childhood diseases with vaccines – why are so many of our children stuck on sick?”

“Why are our special education classrooms so crowded that we can’t find enough money or train teachers fast enough to care for these learning disabled, hyperactive, autistic, asthmatic, diabetic, emotionally disturbed, sick children?” Fisher asked.

Since 1982, she charged, “the numbers of American children with learning disabilities, attention deficit disorder and asthma have doubled; diabetes has tripled; and the incidence of autism has reached epidemic proportions, increasing 200 to 600 percent in every state, marking a staggering 3400 percent increase in the prevalence of autism in our children.”

Scientist have also been warning lawmakers about the vaccine injuries. Dr Mark Geier, holds a PhD in genetics, and was a researcher at the National Institutes of Health for10 years. He has studied vaccines for over 30 years. Dr. Geier and his son, David Geier, are the only independent researchers who have gained access to the Vaccine Safety Datalink database controlled by the CDC, to conduct studies on the connection between vaccines and the epidemic in neurological problems.

In a March 22, 2003 letter to Senator Hillary Clinton, the Geiers reported: “we have concluded in our studies that a causal relationship exists between mercury from thimerosal in childhood vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders.”

“Our best estimates are that the thimerosal contributed to about 75% of the cases of neurodevelpmental disorders while the MMR contributed to about 15%,” they said. “The remaining 10% of the cases were related to mercury in Rhogam, a shot given to Rh-negative women, and to other sources of neurotoxicity.”

On June 18, 2004, Representative Dave Weldon (R-FL), a doctor by calling, was on the floor of Congress waving red flags, and literally begging Congress to recognize the seriousness of the epidemic in children with neurological disorders all over the country.

“Mr. Speaker, something dreadful is happening to our youngest generation, and we must sound the alarm and figure out what is going on with our children,” he said.

He quoted the Department of Health and Human Services when explaining that one in every 167 children was being diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. “Furthermore,” Weldon reported, “one in 7 children is being diagnosed with either a learning disability or a behavioral disability.”

On June 19, 2002, James Bradstreet, MD, Clinical Director of The International Child Development Resource Center in Florida, testified in Washington before the Government Reform Committee, and warned lawmakers about the cost of the autism epidemic back then.

“ICDRC estimates the minimal cost in present value, to care for those 420,000 existing children with autism is $1,260,000,000,000 (based on $3million/lifetime and 420,000 children affected).”

“So a little over a $1 trillion in the next 50 years would be required if we stopped creating new cases today,” Bradstreet said.

“Because autism is doubling every four years, this is likely an overly conservative estimate” he added. “The societal cost could easily be $3-4 trillion.”

On June 20, 2005, Robert F Kennedy, Jr, a relatively new advocate calling for the removal of thimerosal from vaccines, appeared on the Don Imus Show on MSNBC, and warned the public that our government is allowing drug companies to ship thimerosal-containing vaccines for use on children in other countries.

“They’re giving this now to kids all over the third world,” Kennedy warned. “In China, autism was unknown five years ago,” he said. “They started giving them American vaccines containing thimerosal and now they’ve got 1.8 million cases of autism,” he added.

Autism is also exploding in Argentina, India, and Nigeria, Kennedy said.

“What’s going to happen when our enemies around the world realize that the United State’s most heralded foreign policy which is vaccinating the children of the world is poisoning the brains of developing third world children?” he warmed.

“This is just a disaster,” Kennedy told Imus.

But it gets worse. Over the past 15 years, the vaccine scheme has resulted in a full-circle cycle of profits for the pharmaceutical industry. After poisoning an entire generation, drug companies are now making record profits from drugging their victims.

And the true irony of the situation is that due to their partnership with compromised officials and lawmakers, they were able to pull most of it off on the tax payer’s dime. Federal and State government programs, are the largest buyers of vaccines, administered “free” beginning with pregnant women all the way up to seniors citizens in nursing homes.

The vaccine racket is raging on at full-throttle. In 2005, more vaccines were administered to infants under the age of 1 in the US than in any other country. The current immunization schedule calls for 3 doses of Hepatitis B, the first at birth, 3 doses each of DTAP, HIB, IPV, Prevnar, and one dose of flu vaccine before a child’s first birthday.

The first year of childhood vaccines costs $620, and the second year costs $340, according to Pediatric Preventive Care Cost, Estimated US Average, 2005, by Patient Age, Recommendations for Preventive Pediatric Health Care (RE9939) and Recommended Childhood and Adolescent Immunization Schedule, US, 2005.

For the year 2004, the CDC reported the US birth rate to be 4,115,590. Without an industrial size calculator, it would be impossible to do the math to multiply the birth rate by the vaccine costs above. Suffice to say that the total amount represents major profits for vaccine makers especially when most of the bill is sent directly to the tax payers.

As for making money off the vaccine-injured children, between 2000 and 2003, the number of children treated for “severe behavioral conditions” related to conduct disorder and autism rose more than 60%, according to Behavior Drugs Lead in Sales for Children, New York Times, May 17, 2004.

Tax dollars are being directly funneled to the pharmaceutical industry through the damaged children. Public funds currently account for 63% of all mental health spending and Medicaid spending has risen more than 50% since 2000 to more than $300 billion per year, according to Parity-Plus: A Third Way Approach to Fix America’s Mental Health System, Progressive Policy Institute, June 22, 2005; Medicaid Largest US Payer, Daily Health Policy Report, March 30, 20005.

Drug companies have also been raking in major profits from the sale of attention deficit drugs, with much of it coming from the public trough. The National Center for Health Statistics, reports that the number of children aged 3 to 17 with ADHD went from 3.3 million in 1997 to 4.4 million in 2002. Between 2000 and 2004, use of attention deficit stimulant drugs rose 56% among children, according to data compiled Medco Health Solutions, one of the largest prescription benefit managers in the nation.

According to testimony at the February 18, 2004, FDA hearing, by Dr Gianna Rigoni, of the FDA’s Office of Drug Safety, a combined total of approximately 10.8 million prescriptions were dispensed for SSRI antidepressants and atypicals antipsychotics to the 1 to 17-year-old population in 2002, and children between 1 and 11-years-old, accounted for about 2.7 million of those prescriptions.

In 2004, SSRIs and antipsychotics became the third-and fourth-biggest classes of drugs in the country, with sales of $20.7 billion. And much of that cost was borne by government health-care plans, according to the July 27, 2005 Wall Street Journal.

As for the continued use of thimerosal-laced flu vaccines with infants, according to the ACIP report of July 29, 2005 / 54(RR08);1-40, actual deaths from influenza are uncommon among children with and without high-risk conditions. A study that modeled influenza-related deaths estimated that annually, an average of 92 deaths, or 0.4 deaths per 100,000, occurred among children under 5 during the 1990’s.

So, are the risks associated with injecting a full dose of thimerosal into 4,115,590 six-month-old babies worth it when weighed against the benefits, if any, of flu vaccines? More and more parents think not.

http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/vaccine-profit.html